Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Bijective proofs of proper coloring theorems

Combinatorics · Submitted 27 Jul 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We establish all six of these expressions bijectively.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2007.13725 (version 1)
Pith ID376ZVKXV, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBruce E. Sagan (Michigan State University), Vincent Vatter (University of Florida). "Bijective proofs of proper coloring theorems." arXiv:2007.13725 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/376ZVKXV
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,682 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.80 · compares with prior results 0.57 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The chromatic polynomial and its generalization, the chromatic symmetric function, are two important graph invariants. Celebrated theorems of Birkhoff, Whitney, and Stanley show how both objects can be expressed in three different ways: as sums over all spanning subgraphs, as sums over spanning subgraphs with no broken circuits, and in terms of acyclic orientations with compatible colorings. We establish all six of these expressions bijectively. In fact, we do this with only two bijections, as the proofs in the symmetric function setting are obtained using the same bijections as in the polynomial case and the bijection for broken circuits is just a restriction of the one for all spanning subgraphs.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The chromatic polynomial and its generalization, the chromatic symmetric function, are two important graph invariants. background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Celebrated theorems of Birkhoff, Whitney, and Stanley show how both objects can be expressed in three different ways: as sums over all spanning subgraphs, as sums over spanning subgraphs with no broken circuits, and in terms of acyclic orientations with compatible colorings. background 1.00 0.03 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 We establish all six of these expressions bijectively. contribution 0.85 0.97 0.87 asserted 1.00
s3 In fact, we do this with only two bijections, as the proofs in the symmetric function setting are obtained using the same bijections as in the polynomial case and the bijection for broken circuits is just a restriction of the one for all spanning subgraphs. method 0.55 0.95 0.26 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The chromatic polynomial and its generalization, the chromatic symmetric function, are two important graph invariants. Celebrated theorems of Birkhoff, Whitney, and Stanley show how both objects can be expressed in three different ways: as sums over all spanning subgraphs, as sums over spanning subgraphs with no broken circuits, and in terms of acyclic orientations with compatible colorings. We establish all six of these expressions bijectively. In fact, we do this with only two bijections, as the proofs in the symmetric function setting are obtained using the same bijections as in the polynomial case and the bijection for broken circuits is just a restriction of the one for all spanning subgraphs.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.