Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Prismatic cohomology and de Rham-Witt forms

Algebraic Geometry · Submitted 11 Aug 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Subsequently, we define a canonical map from de Rham-Witt forms to prismatic cohomology in the perfect case and prove that it is an isomorphism.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2008.04956 (version 3)
Pith IDM3TY5T3N, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationSemen Molokov. "Prismatic cohomology and de Rham-Witt forms." arXiv:2008.04956 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/M3TY5T3N
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,995 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.36 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.36 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

For any prism $(A, d)$, we construct an analogue of Fontaine's map $W_r(A/d) \to A/d\phi(d)\cdots\phi^{r-1}(d)$. Subsequently, we define a canonical map from de Rham-Witt forms to prismatic cohomology in the perfect case and prove that it is an isomorphism. Using this result, we obtain an explicit description of the prismatic cohomology for a $p$-completed polynomial algebra over $A/d$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 For any prism $(A, d)$, we construct an analogue of Fontaine's map $W_r(A/d) \to A/d\phi(d)\cdots\phi^{r-1}(d)$. contribution 0.94 0.95 0.09 asserted 1.00
s1 Subsequently, we define a canonical map from de Rham-Witt forms to prismatic cohomology in the perfect case and prove that it is an isomorphism. contribution 0.51 0.96 0.59 asserted 1.00
s2 Using this result, we obtain an explicit description of the prismatic cohomology for a $p$-completed polynomial algebra over $A/d$. result 0.97 0.95 0.23 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

For any prism $(A, d)$, we construct an analogue of Fontaine's map $W_r(A/d) \to A/d\phi(d)\cdots\phi^{r-1}(d)$. Subsequently, we define a canonical map from de Rham-Witt forms to prismatic cohomology in the perfect case and prove that it is an isomorphism. Using this result, we obtain an explicit description of the prismatic cohomology for a $p$-completed polynomial algebra over $A/d$.

Human review
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.