Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Pearson cross-correlation in the first four black hole binary mergers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.12663 v3 pith:NCBPZZYX submitted 2020-08-28 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE
keywords ligodatacross-correlationcross-correlationspearsonannouncedblackcollaborations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We adopt the Pearson cross-correlation measure to analyze the LIGO Hanford and LIGO Livingston detector data streams around the events GW150914, GW151012,GW151226 and GW170104. We find that the Pearson cross-correlation method is sensitive to these signals, with correlations peaking when the black hole binaries reconstructed by the LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations, are merging. We compare the obtained cross-correlations with the statistical correlation fluctuations arising in simulated Gaussian noise data and in LIGO data at times when no event is claimed. Our results for the significance of the observed cross-correlations are broadly consistent with those announced by the LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations based on matched-filter analysis. In the same data, if we subtract the maximum likelihood waveforms corresponding to the announced signals, no residual cross-correlations persists at a statistically significant level.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ensemble-Based Residual Tests of GW231123 across Waveform Models

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GW231123's residuals are consistent with detector noise for all five waveform models, and the strain-level differences between models are too small to be detected.

Pith tools