Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A High-Level Description and Performance Evaluation of Pupil Invisible

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.00508 v1 pith:BDPDKOS6 submitted 2020-09-01 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords pupilinvisibleevaluationgaze-estimationglasseshead-mountedtrackeraccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Head-mounted eye trackers promise convenient access to reliable gaze data in unconstrained environments. Due to several limitations, however, often they can only partially deliver on this promise. Among those are the following: (i) the necessity of performing a device setup and calibration prior to every use of the eye tracker, (ii) a lack of robustness of gaze-estimation results against perturbations, such as outdoor lighting conditions and unavoidable slippage of the eye tracker on the head of the subject, and (iii) behavioral distortion resulting from social awkwardness, due to the unnatural appearance of current head-mounted eye trackers. Recently, Pupil Labs released Pupil Invisible glasses, a head-mounted eye tracker engineered to tackle these limitations. Here, we present an extensive evaluation of its gaze-estimation capabilities. To this end, we designed a data-collection protocol and evaluation scheme geared towards providing a faithful portrayal of the real-world usage of Pupil Invisible glasses. In particular, we develop a geometric framework for gauging gaze-estimation accuracy that goes beyond reporting mean angular accuracy. We demonstrate that Pupil Invisible glasses, without the need of a calibration, provide gaze estimates which are robust to perturbations, including outdoor lighting conditions and slippage of the headset.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Multimodal Framework for Understanding Collaborative Design Processes

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multimodal framework and visualization system, reCAPit, automatically extracts activity, attention, and topic segments from workshop recordings to help analysts trace how design decisions emerged.

  2. Multidimensional Assessment of Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In conditionally automated driving, situational awareness predicts fast reflexive takeover responses, while spare capacity predicts takeover quality, comfort, and safety.

Pith tools