REVIEW 1 cited by
$\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^*(1520)\ell^+\ell^-$ form factors from lattice QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present the first lattice QCD determination of the $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^*(1520)$ vector, axial vector, and tensor form factors that are relevant for the rare decays $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^*(1520)\ell^+\ell^-$. The lattice calculation is performed in the $\Lambda^*(1520)$ rest frame with nonzero $\Lambda_b$ momenta, and is limited to the high-$q^2$ region. An interpolating field with covariant derivatives is used to obtain good overlap with the $\Lambda^*(1520)$. The analysis treats the $\Lambda^*(1520)$ as a stable particle, which is expected to be a reasonable approximation for this narrow resonance. A domain-wall action is used for the light and strange quarks, while the $b$ quark is implemented with an anisotropic clover action with coefficients tuned to produce the correct $B_s$ kinetic mass, rest mass, and hyperfine splitting. We use three different ensembles of lattice gauge-field configurations generated by the RBC and UKQCD collaborations, and perform extrapolations of the form factors to the continuum limit and physical pion mass. We give Standard-Model predictions for the $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^*(1520)\ell^+\ell^-$ differential branching fraction and angular observables in the high-$q^2$ region.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
$\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^{(\ast)}\nu\bar{\nu}$ decays and the recent Belle-II $B^+\to K^+\nu\bar{\nu}$ data
Belle-II's B+ -> K+ nu nubar excess, if due to new physics, constrains the branching ratios and angular observables of Lambda_b -> Lambda(*) nu nubar decays, with the hadronic forward-backward asymmetry the best discr...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.