Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tasks, stability, architecture, and compute: Training more effective learned optimizers, and using them to train themselves

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.11243 v1 pith:JKYM5R5N submitted 2020-09-23 cs.LG cs.NEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.NEstat.ML
keywords optimizerslearnedtaskstraintrainingarchitecturecomputefeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Much as replacing hand-designed features with learned functions has revolutionized how we solve perceptual tasks, we believe learned algorithms will transform how we train models. In this work we focus on general-purpose learned optimizers capable of training a wide variety of problems with no user-specified hyperparameters. We introduce a new, neural network parameterized, hierarchical optimizer with access to additional features such as validation loss to enable automatic regularization. Most learned optimizers have been trained on only a single task, or a small number of tasks. We train our optimizers on thousands of tasks, making use of orders of magnitude more compute, resulting in optimizers that generalize better to unseen tasks. The learned optimizers not only perform well, but learn behaviors that are distinct from existing first order optimizers. For instance, they generate update steps that have implicit regularization and adapt as the problem hyperparameters (e.g. batch size) or architecture (e.g. neural network width) change. Finally, these learned optimizers show evidence of being useful for out of distribution tasks such as training themselves from scratch.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Should We Meta-Learn Reinforcement Learning Algorithms?

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic comparison of black-box evolution, neural and symbolic distillation, and LLM-based proposal for meta-learning RL algorithms yields practical recommendations: warm-started LLM proposal is sample-efficient,...

Pith tools