Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Fundamental parameters for 45 open clusters with Gaia DR2, an improved extinction correction and a metallicity gradient prior

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics · Submitted 24 Sep 2020 · 49 references

Pith's verdict: A useful catalog paper for 45 leftover open clusters with transparent methods, but the distance validation is partly circular and the 'substantial improvement' claim outruns the evidence.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 27, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2009.11834 (version 1)
Pith IDZ2L5WGIX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Moitinho, Carraro, E. Paunzen, G., H. Monteiro, J. R. D. L\'epine, T. Cantat-Gaudin, W. S. Dias. "Fundamental parameters for 45 open clusters with Gaia DR2, an improved extinction correction and a metallicity gradient prior." arXiv:2009.11834 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/Z2L5WGIX
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

This paper provides the first Gaia DR2-based fundamental parameters—memberships, mean proper motions and parallaxes, radial velocities for 12 clusters, and isochrone-fit distances, ages, extinctions, and metallicities—for 45 open clusters…

The reading

This paper takes 45 open clusters listed in an existing catalogue but missing from the Gaia DR2-based cluster surveys, and gives each one its first astrometric membership, mean proper motion, mean parallax, and isochrone-fit distance, age, reddening, and metallicity. The authors argue these determinations are a substantial improvement over earlier values because they combine Gaia DR2 astrometry with an updated extinction treatment for Gaia photometry and a Galactic metallicity-gradient prior. A reader should care because reliable cluster parameters are the empirical backbone for mapping the Milky Way's structure and stellar evolution, and the improved extinction polynomial is a reusable tool for future cluster fits. The paper also flags that several objects recently reported as newly discovered clusters were already known, which matters for building clean cluster samples.

What carries the argument

The machinery has three parts. Membership comes from a maximum-likelihood Gaussian mixture in the three-dimensional space of proper motion components and parallax, using each star's full covariance matrix. Parameters come from an isochrone-fitting code that minimizes a likelihood comparing synthetic clusters from PARSEC 1.2S isochrones to Gaia DR2 $G_{BP}$/$G_{RP}$ colour-magnitude data, with the cross-entropy method selecting the best fits and bootstrapping error estimates. The novel piece is the extinction correction: a fourth-degree polynomial $k_m(A_V, G_{BP}-G_{RP})$ for the Gaia bands, constructed by convolving Kurucz model spectra with the Maíz Apellániz & Weiler (2018) passbands and the Fitzpatrick et al. (2019) extinction law, which removes a convergence failure seen in about 20% of the initial fits when extinction was high. Metallicity is constrained by a prior from the Galactic abundance gradient rather than fixed to solar, which the authors show reduces bias in $A_V$ and gives [Fe/H] values consistent with high-resolution spectroscopy to within a baseline error of 0.15 dex.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for 45 open clusters with no previous Gaia DR2-based membership estimate, the combination of a maximum-likelihood astrometric membership model and a cross-entropy isochrone fit yields reliable fundamental parameters: membership probabilities, mean proper motions and parallaxes, radial velocities for 12 clusters, and age, distance, extinction $A_V$, and [Fe/H] for all 45. The authors validate the updated fitting procedure—a full fourth-degree extinction polynomial for the Gaia $G$, $G_{BP}$, $G_{RP}$ passbands built from the Fitzpatrick et al. (2019) extinction law, plus a metallicity prior from the Galactic abundance gradient—against clusters with high-resolution spectroscopic metallicities, and find agreement with literature [Fe/H], with parallax distances, and with the better sources in the literature. They further claim these results represent a substantial improvement over previous published values and provide the first distance and age for Majaess 65 and the first age for Ruprecht 123, with DC 3 emerging as one of the oldest and most distant known open clusters.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the PARSEC 1.2S stellar models and the Fitzpatrick et al. (2019) extinction law correctly describe every cluster's stars and line of sight, so any systematic bias in those models for certain masses, metallicities, or sightlines is inherited by every fitted distance, age, and extinction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For all 45 clusters, the catalogue gives the first Gaia DR2-based mean proper motions, parallaxes, memberships, and isochrone-fit parameters, so future Galactic-structure work can include them.
  • The updated extinction polynomial and metallicity-gradient prior can be applied to other cluster samples; the validation shows they avoid the systematic overestimate in $A_V$ that comes from assuming solar metallicity.
  • Comparing parameters with the DAML and MWSC catalogues shows that a human-curated compilation can outperform a homogeneous automated catalogue once the latter's values are removed, and highlights cases where Gaia data revise old ages, such as NGC 133.
  • The identification of known DAML clusters among newly reported discoveries implies that some claimed new clusters are re-detections, so cross-matching against existing catalogues is necessary.
  • For the youngest clusters, the pre-main-sequence portions of the PARSEC isochrones match the main-sequence fits, indicating the models are usable down to about 4 Myr in Gaia bands, but results younger than roughly 10 Myr need visual confirmation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to apply the same pipeline to the remaining DAML clusters still lacking Gaia memberships; the success rate on these 45 difficult leftovers suggests a substantial fraction of the catalogue can be brought to the same standard.
  • Because the paper's [Fe/H] values are strongly informed by the gradient prior, they should not be read as independent abundance measurements; the real payoff is that the prior absorbs a nuisance parameter and sharpens distances, ages, and extinction.
  • The rediscovery result implies that automated cluster finders may overcount new clusters by a few percent; cross-matching in position, proper motion, and parallax space, not just position, should become standard.
  • The fourth-degree extinction polynomial is a concrete reusable artefact: anyone fitting Gaia photometry with the same extinction law can adopt these coefficients, and comparing them with alternative extinction laws would test how much of the parameter improvement depends on that choice.
Original abstract

Reliable fundamental parameters of open clusters such as distance, age and extinction are key to our understanding of Galactic structure and stellar evolution. In this work we use {\it Gaia} DR2 to investigate 45 open clusters listed in the \emph{New catalogue of optically visible open clusters and candidates} (DAML) but with no previous astrometric membership estimation based on {\it Gaia} DR2. In the process of selecting targets for this study we found that some clusters reported as new discoveries in recent papers based on {\it Gaia} DR2 were already known clusters listed in DAML. Cluster memberships were determined using a maximum likelihood method applied to {\it Gaia} DR2 astrometry. This has allowed us to estimate mean proper motions and mean parallaxes for all investigated clusters. Mean radial velocities were also determined for 12 clusters, 7 of which had no previous published values. We have improved our isochrone fitting code to account for interstellar extinction using an updated extinction polynomial for the {\it Gaia} DR2 photometric band-passes and the Galactic abundance gradient as a prior for metallicity. The updated procedure was validated with a sample of clusters with high quality $[Fe/H]$ determinations. We then did a critical review of the literature and verified that our cluster parameter determinations represent a substantial improvement over previous values.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,974 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.20 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.87 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Reliable fundamental parameters of open clusters such as distance, age and extinction are key to our understanding of Galactic structure and stellar evolution. In this work we use {\it Gaia} DR2 to investigate 45 open clusters listed in the \emph{New catalogue of optically visible open clusters and candidates} (DAML) but with no previous astrometric membership estimation based on {\it Gaia} DR2. In the process of selecting targets for this study we found that some clusters reported as new discoveries in recent papers based on {\it Gaia} DR2 were already known clusters listed in DAML. Cluster memberships were determined using a maximum likelihood method applied to {\it Gaia} DR2 astrometry. This has allowed us to estimate mean proper motions and mean parallaxes for all investigated clusters. Mean radial velocities were also determined for 12 clusters, 7 of which had no previous published values. We have improved our isochrone fitting code to account for interstellar extinction using an updated extinction polynomial for the {\it Gaia} DR2 photometric band-passes and the Galactic abundance gradient as a prior for metallicity. The updated procedure was validated with a sample of clusters with high quality $[Fe/H]$ determinations. We then did a critical review of the literature and verified that our cluster parameter determinations represent a substantial improvement over previous values.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Reliable fundamental parameters of open clusters such as distance, age and extinction are key to our understanding of Galactic structure and stellar evolution. background 1.00 0.04 0.05 asserted 1.00
s1 In this work we use {\it Gaia} DR2 to investigate 45 open clusters listed in the \emph{New catalogue of optically visible open clusters and candidates} (DAML) but with no previous astrometric membership estimation based on {\it Gaia} DR2. contribution 0.93 0.85 0.04 asserted 0.98
s2 In the process of selecting targets for this study we found that some clusters reported as new discoveries in recent papers based on {\it Gaia} DR2 were already known clusters listed in DAML. result 0.88 0.95 0.04 asserted 1.00
s3 Cluster memberships were determined using a maximum likelihood method applied to {\it Gaia} DR2 astrometry. method 1.00 0.94 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 This has allowed us to estimate mean proper motions and mean parallaxes for all investigated clusters. result 0.98 0.96 0.06 asserted 1.00
s5 Mean radial velocities were also determined for 12 clusters, 7 of which had no previous published values. result 0.96 0.97 0.06 asserted 1.00
s6 We have improved our isochrone fitting code to account for interstellar extinction using an updated extinction polynomial for the {\it Gaia} DR2 photometric band-passes and the Galactic abundance gradient as a prior for metallicity. method 0.86 0.96 0.07 asserted 1.00
s7 The updated procedure was validated with a sample of clusters with high quality $[Fe/H]$ determinations. method 0.84 0.93 0.06 asserted 1.00
s8 We then did a critical review of the literature and verified that our cluster parameter determinations represent a substantial improvement over previous values. result 0.55 0.93 0.62 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.74 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures
Figure 1. Comparison of results obtained for the fundamental parameters with [Fe/H] held fixed at the value from Carrera et al. (2019) and allowed to vary with a prior based on the Galactic metallicity gradient as described in the text
Figure 2. Discrepancies in parameter estimates, obtained from fits using a prior for [Fe/H] based on the Galactic metallicity gradient and fits using [Fe/H] = 0.0 when compared to estimates obtained from fits where [Fe/H] is fixed to the values from Carrera et al. (2019). should not be used as a proper metallicity determination for the open clusters studied. While the derived values of [Fe/H] are indicative of the metallicity of individual clusters, statis￾tically they are based on the metallicity gradient prior and thus cannot be used as a set for determining the Galactic abundance gradient.…
Figure 3. Comparison of [Fe/H] estimates obtained from isochrone fits using the Galactic metallicity gradient as prior to values obtained from the literature. Left panel shows comparison to values from APOGEE from Carrera et al. (2019), where symbols are colored according to AV . No systematic deviations due to AV are apparent. Right panel shows comparison to values from Netopil et al. (2016) indicating errors as described in the text and discriminating between the high quality sample (HQS) and the lower quality sample (LQS) as defined by the authors
Figure 4. Example of a rediscovered star cluster. Field of 130×130 centered on Hogg 22, with coordinates from Dias et al. (2002). The members of the cluster labelled UBC 547 by Castro-Ginard et al. (2020) are marked in red. In the upper right (N-W) we start seeing a concentration of bright stars which are on the edge of the nearby open cluster NGC 6204. note that the selected sample of 75 clusters is composed of the leftovers from previous works. Thus, in fact our pipeline has been able to successfully handle 45 remaining consider￾ably difficult cases. The classifications from DAML illustrate…
Figure 5. Comparison of distances obtained from parallaxes and isochrone fitting, both based on Gaia DR2. from parallaxes were estimated by considering a symmetric distribution so that σ = r95 − r5/(2 × 1.645), which is equiv￾alent to 1σ Gaussian uncertainty, where r5 and r95 are 5th and 95th percentile confidence intervals. The comparison shows a good agreement between the parallax distance and the one obtained via isochrone fitting. After 2.5 kpc a slight tendency for larger distances from par￾allaxes can be seen, but still within the errors. The result is a clear improvement with respect to
Figure 6. Comparison of the values of distance (left panel), age (middle panel) and AV (right panel) obtained by the isochrone fit with those published in DAML (top) and MWSC (bottom). parallaxes provide the best distances, but at larger distances isochrone fits are better. Assuming the algorithm employed in the MWSC is flawless, the relatively shallow data used in the MWSC limits its usefulness to bright and/or close clusters. The DAML catalogue is a compilation of results from the literature. While it is non-homogeneous in nature, it is curated. The curators choose the best results, when…
Figure 7. CMDs and isochrone fits (continued) Lyng˚a G., 1988, in European Southern Observatory Conference and Workshop Proceedings. pp 379–382 Lyra W., Moitinho A., van der Bliek N. S., Alves J., 2006, A&A, 453, 101 Ma´ız Apell´aniz J., Weiler M., 2018, A&A, 619, A180 Maurya J., Joshi Y. C., Gour A. S., 2020, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2005.07375 Moitinho A., 2010, in de Grijs R., L´epine J. R. D., eds, IAU Sym￾posium Vol. 266, Star Clusters: Basic Galactic Building Blocks Throughout Time and Space. pp 106–116 (arXiv:0911.1459), doi:10.1017/S1743921309990949 Monteiro H., Dias W. S., 2019, MNR

Figures reproduced from arXiv:2009.11834 by the authors.

References
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.