Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Grey Hoodie Project: Big Tobacco, Big Tech, and the threat on academic integrity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.13676 v4 pith:OHKEFIRM submitted 2020-09-28 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords techacademicacademicsinfluenceactionsfundingindividualindustry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As governmental bodies rely on academics' expert advice to shape policy regarding Artificial Intelligence, it is important that these academics not have conflicts of interests that may cloud or bias their judgement. Our work explores how Big Tech can actively distort the academic landscape to suit its needs. By comparing the well-studied actions of another industry (Big Tobacco) to the current actions of Big Tech we see similar strategies employed by both industries. These strategies enable either industry to sway and influence academic and public discourse. We examine the funding of academic research as a tool used by Big Tech to put forward a socially responsible public image, influence events hosted by and decisions made by funded universities, influence the research questions and plans of individual scientists, and discover receptive academics who can be leveraged. We demonstrate how Big Tech can affect academia from the institutional level down to individual researchers. Thus, we believe that it is vital, particularly for universities and other institutions of higher learning, to discuss the appropriateness and the tradeoffs of accepting funding from Big Tech, and what limitations or conditions should be put in place.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Weaponization: NLP Security for Medium and Lower-Resourced Languages in Their Own Right

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An empirical study showing that smaller monolingual language models are more vulnerable to adversarial attacks than larger multilingual models across 70 languages, though multilinguality alone does not guarantee security.

Pith tools