Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Empirical Study of Tokenization Strategies for Various Korean NLP Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.02534 v1 pith:GDLRMKVX submitted 2020-10-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords tokenizationkoreantasksbestworkssegmentationstrategiestext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Typically, tokenization is the very first step in most text processing works. As a token serves as an atomic unit that embeds the contextual information of text, how to define a token plays a decisive role in the performance of a model.Even though Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) has been considered the de facto standard tokenization method due to its simplicity and universality, it still remains unclear whether BPE works best across all languages and tasks. In this paper, we test several tokenization strategies in order to answer our primary research question, that is, "What is the best tokenization strategy for Korean NLP tasks?" Experimental results demonstrate that a hybrid approach of morphological segmentation followed by BPE works best in Korean to/from English machine translation and natural language understanding tasks such as KorNLI, KorSTS, NSMC, and PAWS-X. As an exception, for KorQuAD, the Korean extension of SQuAD, BPE segmentation turns out to be the most effective.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparative analysis of subword tokenization approaches for Indian languages

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Across SMT and NMT models for 11 Indian languages, SentencePiece gives the highest BLEU for most language pairs, while BPE wins in the multilingual model.

Pith tools