REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey on Recognizing Textual Entailment as an NLP Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) was proposed as a unified evaluation framework to compare semantic understanding of different NLP systems. In this survey paper, we provide an overview of different approaches for evaluating and understanding the reasoning capabilities of NLP systems. We then focus our discussion on RTE by highlighting prominent RTE datasets as well as advances in RTE dataset that focus on specific linguistic phenomena that can be used to evaluate NLP systems on a fine-grained level. We conclude by arguing that when evaluating NLP systems, the community should utilize newly introduced RTE datasets that focus on specific linguistic phenomena.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PEML: Parameter-efficient Multi-Task Learning with Optimized Continuous Prompts
PEML co-optimizes continuous prompts and low-rank adaptations to deliver up to 6.67% average accuracy gains over existing multi-task PEFT methods on GLUE, SuperGLUE, and other benchmarks.
-
ADMM-Q: An Improved Hessian-based Weight Quantizer for Post-Training Quantization of Large Language Models
ADMM-Q is a new post-training quantization method using ADMM operator splitting that reduces WikiText-2 perplexity compared to GPTQ on Qwen3-8B across W3A16, W4A8, and W2A4KV4 settings.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.