REVIEW 1 cited by
Are mental states nonlocal?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
I show that if mental states are function of physical states, then they are nonlocal, in a sense that will be explained. I argue that, if mental states are reducible to brain physics, and if they are integrated experiences, this nonlocality implies that Classical Physics is not enough, in particular the computationalist thesis does not hold. I illustrate the argument with a thought experiment. The proof of nonlocality is straightforward and general, but the result is counterintuitive, so I spend a large part of the article discussing possible objections, alternatives, and implications. I discuss the possibility that Quantum Physics allows this kind of nonlocality.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Observation as Physication. A single-world unitary no-conspiracy interpretation of quantum mechanics
A proposed interpretation of quantum mechanics, physication, assigns the physical meaning of operators through observation so that measurements have definite outcomes while the state evolves unitarily in a single world.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.