Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

AI Song Contest: Human-AI Co-Creation in Songwriting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.05388 v1 pith:X26R3CCL submitted 2020-10-12 cs.SD cs.HCcs.LGeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.HCcs.LGeess.AS
keywords modelsteamsmusicsongchallengeschallengingfindingsmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning is challenging the way we make music. Although research in deep generative models has dramatically improved the capability and fluency of music models, recent work has shown that it can be challenging for humans to partner with this new class of algorithms. In this paper, we present findings on what 13 musician/developer teams, a total of 61 users, needed when co-creating a song with AI, the challenges they faced, and how they leveraged and repurposed existing characteristics of AI to overcome some of these challenges. Many teams adopted modular approaches, such as independently running multiple smaller models that align with the musical building blocks of a song, before re-combining their results. As ML models are not easily steerable, teams also generated massive numbers of samples and curated them post-hoc, or used a range of strategies to direct the generation, or algorithmically ranked the samples. Ultimately, teams not only had to manage the "flare and focus" aspects of the creative process, but also juggle them with a parallel process of exploring and curating multiple ML models and outputs. These findings reflect a need to design machine learning-powered music interfaces that are more decomposable, steerable, interpretable, and adaptive, which in return will enable artists to more effectively explore how AI can extend their personal expression.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Algorithmic Flattening of Sound: Computational Evidence and Justice Implications of AI Music Homogenization

    cs.CY 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An audit of Suno and Lyria 3 shows Lyria compresses music within genres while Suno blurs boundaries between genres, and both systems remain easily distinguishable from human-made music.

  2. Workflow-Based Evaluation of Music Generation Systems

    eess.AS 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single-producer workflow evaluation of eight music AI tools finds they work as idea and sound generators but not as complete composers, and proposes a reusable framework.

  3. Learning Normal Patterns in Musical Loops

    cs.SD 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Deep SVDD model using HTS-AT and feature fusion learns normal patterns in variable-length bass and guitar loops, with residual connections improving the learned latent space.

Pith tools