REVIEW 1 cited by
Increasing Depth Leads to U-Shaped Test Risk in Over-parameterized Convolutional Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent works have demonstrated that increasing model capacity through width in over-parameterized neural networks leads to a decrease in test risk. For neural networks, however, model capacity can also be increased through depth, yet understanding the impact of increasing depth on test risk remains an open question. In this work, we demonstrate that the test risk of over-parameterized convolutional networks is a U-shaped curve (i.e. monotonically decreasing, then increasing) with increasing depth. We first provide empirical evidence for this phenomenon via image classification experiments using both ResNets and the convolutional neural tangent kernel (CNTK). We then present a novel linear regression framework for characterizing the impact of depth on test risk, and show that increasing depth leads to a U-shaped test risk for the linear CNTK. In particular, we prove that the linear CNTK corresponds to a depth-dependent linear transformation on the original space and characterize properties of this transformation. We then analyze over-parameterized linear regression under arbitrary linear transformations and, in simplified settings, provably identify the depths which minimize each of the bias and variance terms of the test risk.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quantifying the Prediction Uncertainty of Machine Learning Models for Individual Data
A per-sample confidence score derived from the pNML min-max regret is applied to linear regression and neural networks, and improves OOD detection, adversarial robustness, and active learning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.