REVIEW 1 cited by
Deep Clustering of Text Representations for Supervision-free Probing of Syntax
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We explore deep clustering of text representations for unsupervised model interpretation and induction of syntax. As these representations are high-dimensional, out-of-the-box methods like KMeans do not work well. Thus, our approach jointly transforms the representations into a lower-dimensional cluster-friendly space and clusters them. We consider two notions of syntax: Part of speech Induction (POSI) and constituency labelling (CoLab) in this work. Interestingly, we find that Multilingual BERT (mBERT) contains surprising amount of syntactic knowledge of English; possibly even as much as English BERT (EBERT). Our model can be used as a supervision-free probe which is arguably a less-biased way of probing. We find that unsupervised probes show benefits from higher layers as compared to supervised probes. We further note that our unsupervised probe utilizes EBERT and mBERT representations differently, especially for POSI. We validate the efficacy of our probe by demonstrating its capabilities as an unsupervised syntax induction technique. Our probe works well for both syntactic formalisms by simply adapting the input representations. We report competitive performance of our probe on 45-tag English POSI, state-of-the-art performance on 12-tag POSI across 10 languages, and competitive results on CoLab. We also perform zero-shot syntax induction on resource impoverished languages and report strong results.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Models
A systematic review of 337 articles shows Transformers handle formal syntax well but perform worse and more variably at the syntax-semantics interface, with the field over-reliant on English and BERT.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.