REVIEW 2 cited by
Constructing Taxonomies from Pretrained Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a method for constructing taxonomic trees (e.g., WordNet) using pretrained language models. Our approach is composed of two modules, one that predicts parenthood relations and another that reconciles those predictions into trees. The parenthood prediction module produces likelihood scores for each potential parent-child pair, creating a graph of parent-child relation scores. The tree reconciliation module treats the task as a graph optimization problem and outputs the maximum spanning tree of this graph. We train our model on subtrees sampled from WordNet, and test on non-overlapping WordNet subtrees. We show that incorporating web-retrieved glosses can further improve performance. On the task of constructing subtrees of English WordNet, the model achieves 66.7 ancestor F1, a 20.0% relative increase over the previous best published result on this task. In addition, we convert the original English dataset into nine other languages using Open Multilingual WordNet and extend our results across these languages.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Leveraging Large Language Models for Generating Research Topic Ontologies: A Multi-Disciplinary Study
Fine-tuned open-weight LLMs classify research-topic relationships with up to 93.5% F1 on a new multi-disciplinary benchmark, and cross-domain transfer loses only about 5 points.
-
Benchmarking Resource-Efficient LLMs for Research Topic Ontology Generation in the Biomedical Field
Fine-tuning small open-source LLMs on a new MeSH-derived benchmark (MeSH-Rel-4K) raises semantic-relation classification F1 by 34.1 points on average, reaching 91.6% for gemma-2-9b.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.