Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CPR: Understanding and Improving Failure Tolerant Training for Deep Learning Recommendation with Partial Recovery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.02999 v1 pith:GA2G4BRI submitted 2020-11-05 cs.LG cs.DC

classification cs.LGcs.DC
keywords recoverytrainingpartialrecommendationaccuracymodeloverheadanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The paper proposes and optimizes a partial recovery training system, CPR, for recommendation models. CPR relaxes the consistency requirement by enabling non-failed nodes to proceed without loading checkpoints when a node fails during training, improving failure-related overheads. The paper is the first to the extent of our knowledge to perform a data-driven, in-depth analysis of applying partial recovery to recommendation models and identified a trade-off between accuracy and performance. Motivated by the analysis, we present CPR, a partial recovery training system that can reduce the training time and maintain the desired level of model accuracy by (1) estimating the benefit of partial recovery, (2) selecting an appropriate checkpoint saving interval, and (3) prioritizing to save updates of more frequently accessed parameters. Two variants of CPR, CPR-MFU and CPR-SSU, reduce the checkpoint-related overhead from 8.2-8.5% to 0.53-0.68% compared to full recovery, on a configuration emulating the failure pattern and overhead of a production-scale cluster. While reducing overhead significantly, CPR achieves model quality on par with the more expensive full recovery scheme, training the state-of-the-art recommendation model using Criteo's Ads CTR dataset. Our preliminary results also suggest that CPR can speed up training on a real production-scale cluster, without notably degrading the accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PHOENIX: Resilient LLM Training with Hot-Swapping via Zero-Overhead Checkpoint

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    PHOENIX recovers permanent node failures in LLM training via hot-swapping of spares using zero-overhead per-step in-memory optimizer-state replication, finishing recovery in under 40 s on up to 512 GPUs.

  2. Lossless Compression for LLM Tensor Incremental Snapshots

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A delta-aware compressor for LLM checkpoints using byte-grouping, RLE, and adaptive Huffman beats bzip2 in ratio with much higher speed, but the comparison omits zstd and no code is released.

Pith tools