REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluating Curriculum Learning Strategies in Neural Combinatorial Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) aims at designing problem-independent and efficient neural network-based strategies for solving combinatorial problems. The field recently experienced growth by successfully adapting architectures originally designed for machine translation. Even though the results are promising, a large gap still exists between NCO models and classic deterministic solvers, both in terms of accuracy and efficiency. One of the drawbacks of current approaches is the inefficiency of training on multiple problem sizes. Curriculum learning strategies have been shown helpful in increasing performance in the multi-task setting. In this work, we focus on designing a curriculum learning-based training procedure that can help existing architectures achieve competitive performance on a large range of problem sizes simultaneously. We provide a systematic investigation of several training procedures and use the insights gained to motivate application of a psychologically-inspired approach to improve upon the classic curriculum method.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On Distributional Dependent Performance of Classical and Neural Routing Solvers
Training neural routing solvers on subsamples of a fixed base node distribution narrows or reverses the performance gap to classical OR meta-heuristics on several TSP and CVRP benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.