REVIEW 1 cited by
Deep Ordinal Regression using Optimal Transport Loss and Unimodal Output Probabilities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
It is often desired that ordinal regression models yield unimodal predictions. However, in many recent works this characteristic is either absent, or implemented using soft targets, which do not guarantee unimodal outputs at inference. In addition, we argue that the standard maximum likelihood objective is not suitable for ordinal regression problems, and that optimal transport is better suited for this task, as it naturally captures the order of the classes. In this work, we propose a framework for deep ordinal regression, based on unimodal output distribution and optimal transport loss. Inspired by the well-known Proportional Odds model, we propose to modify its design by using an architectural mechanism which guarantees that the model output distribution will be unimodal. We empirically analyze the different components of our proposed approach and demonstrate their contribution to the performance of the model. Experimental results on eight real-world datasets demonstrate that our proposed approach consistently performs on par with and often better than several recently proposed deep learning approaches for deep ordinal regression with unimodal output probabilities, while having guarantee on the output unimodality. In addition, we demonstrate that proposed approach is less overconfident than current baselines.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
VEFX-Bench: A Holistic Benchmark for Generic Video Editing and Visual Effects
VEFX-Bench releases a large human-labeled video editing dataset, a multi-dimensional reward model, and a standardized benchmark that better matches human judgments than generic evaluators.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.