REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluating Semantic Accuracy of Data-to-Text Generation with Natural Language Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A major challenge in evaluating data-to-text (D2T) generation is measuring the semantic accuracy of the generated text, i.e. checking if the output text contains all and only facts supported by the input data. We propose a new metric for evaluating the semantic accuracy of D2T generation based on a neural model pretrained for natural language inference (NLI). We use the NLI model to check textual entailment between the input data and the output text in both directions, allowing us to reveal omissions or hallucinations. Input data are converted to text for NLI using trivial templates. Our experiments on two recent D2T datasets show that our metric can achieve high accuracy in identifying erroneous system outputs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
BugRepro: Enhancing Android Bug Reproduction with Domain-Specific Knowledge Integration
BugRepro combines RAG with UI transition graphs to improve LLM-based Android bug reproduction, reporting 96/151 success versus 55/151 for AdbGPT, though the evaluation may be contaminated by data overlap.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.