REVIEW 1 cited by
Balance Regularized Neural Network Models for Causal Effect Estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Estimating individual and average treatment effects from observational data is an important problem in many domains such as healthcare and e-commerce. In this paper, we advocate balance regularization of multi-head neural network architectures. Our work is motivated by representation learning techniques to reduce differences between treated and untreated distributions that potentially arise due to confounding factors. We further regularize the model by encouraging it to predict control outcomes for individuals in the treatment group that are similar to control outcomes in the control group. We empirically study the bias-variance trade-off between different weightings of the regularizers, as well as between inductive and transductive inference.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the Mechanistic Interpretability of Neural Networks for Causality in Bio-statistics
Probing, ablation, and causal tracing can expose how small neural-network nuisance estimators in TMLE encode confounders, based on proof-of-concept experiments on synthetic bio-statistical data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.