Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Interpretability and Explainability: A Machine Learning Zoo Mini-tour

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.01805 v2 pith:X7WK3SS7 submitted 2020-12-03 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learningexplainabilityinterpretabilitymachinereviewmanyresearchalthough
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this review, we examine the problem of designing interpretable and explainable machine learning models. Interpretability and explainability lie at the core of many machine learning and statistical applications in medicine, economics, law, and natural sciences. Although interpretability and explainability have escaped a clear universal definition, many techniques motivated by these properties have been developed over the recent 30 years with the focus currently shifting towards deep learning methods. In this review, we emphasise the divide between interpretability and explainability and illustrate these two different research directions with concrete examples of the state-of-the-art. The review is intended for a general machine learning audience with interest in exploring the problems of interpretation and explanation beyond logistic regression or random forest variable importance. This work is not an exhaustive literature survey, but rather a primer focusing selectively on certain lines of research which the authors found interesting or informative.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-criteria Rank-based Aggregation for Explainable AI

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-criteria rank-based aggregation method that combines LIME, SHAP, and ANCHOR explanations, weighted by new rank-based complexity, faithfulness, and stability metrics, is proposed and tested on five datasets.

Pith tools