Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Probabilistic Tracklet Scoring and Inpainting for Multiple Object Tracking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.02337 v2 pith:4B5CH2FW submitted 2020-12-03 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords trackingmodelmultipleobjecttracklettrackletsachievedlong
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the recent advances in multiple object tracking (MOT), achieved by joint detection and tracking, dealing with long occlusions remains a challenge. This is due to the fact that such techniques tend to ignore the long-term motion information. In this paper, we introduce a probabilistic autoregressive motion model to score tracklet proposals by directly measuring their likelihood. This is achieved by training our model to learn the underlying distribution of natural tracklets. As such, our model allows us not only to assign new detections to existing tracklets, but also to inpaint a tracklet when an object has been lost for a long time, e.g., due to occlusion, by sampling tracklets so as to fill the gap caused by misdetections. Our experiments demonstrate the superiority of our approach at tracking objects in challenging sequences; it outperforms the state of the art in most standard MOT metrics on multiple MOT benchmark datasets, including MOT16, MOT17, and MOT20.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SAM2Auto: Auto Annotation Using FLASH

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SAM2Auto combines four existing vision models into a no-training video annotation pipeline, but its automatic annotations are substantially less accurate than semi-supervised baselines and the paper contains contradic...

Pith tools