REVIEW 2 cited by
Counting Substructures with Higher-Order Graph Neural Networks: Possibility and Impossibility Results
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
While message passing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become increasingly popular architectures for learning with graphs, recent works have revealed important shortcomings in their expressive power. In response, several higher-order GNNs have been proposed that substantially increase the expressive power, albeit at a large computational cost. Motivated by this gap, we explore alternative strategies and lower bounds. In particular, we analyze a new recursive pooling technique of local neighborhoods that allows different tradeoffs of computational cost and expressive power. First, we prove that this model can count subgraphs of size $k$, and thereby overcomes a known limitation of low-order GNNs. Second, we show how recursive pooling can exploit sparsity to reduce the computational complexity compared to the existing higher-order GNNs. More generally, we provide a (near) matching information-theoretic lower bound for counting subgraphs with graph representations that pool over representations of derived (sub-)graphs. We also discuss lower bounds on time complexity.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Learning Efficient Positional Encodings with Graph Neural Networks
PEARL generates expressive, stable, and scalable graph positional encodings by passing random or basis node features through message-passing GNNs and pooling the outputs.
-
Balancing Efficiency and Expressiveness: Subgraph GNNs with Walk-Based Centrality
Ranking nodes with subgraph centrality and using those scores as structural features lets subgraph GNNs match full-bag performance with one or two marked subgraphs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.