REVIEW 1 cited by
Are DNNs fooled by extremely unrecognizable images?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Fooling images are a potential threat to deep neural networks (DNNs). These images are not recognizable to humans as natural objects, such as dogs and cats, but are misclassified by DNNs as natural-object classes with high confidence scores. Despite their original design concept, existing fooling images retain some features that are characteristic of the target objects if looked into closely. Hence, DNNs can react to these features. In this paper, we address the question of whether there can be fooling images with no characteristic pattern of natural objects locally or globally. As a minimal case, we introduce single-color images with a few pixels altered, called sparse fooling images (SFIs). We first prove that SFIs always exist under mild conditions for linear and nonlinear models and reveal that complex models are more likely to be vulnerable to SFI attacks. With two SFI generation methods, we demonstrate that in deeper layers, SFIs end up with similar features to those of natural images, and consequently, fool DNNs successfully. Among other layers, we discovered that the max pooling layer causes the vulnerability against SFIs. The defense against SFIs and transferability are also discussed. This study highlights the new vulnerability of DNNs by introducing a novel class of images that distributes extremely far from natural images.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
HEM: a margin-based loss for visual categorisation tasks
A new margin-based loss, HEM, trains image classifiers that are more robust to unknown and adversarial inputs and better at continual learning and segmentation than cross-entropy-trained models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.