Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Identity-Driven DeepFake Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.03930 v1 pith:RVMFGPVF submitted 2020-12-07 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords detectionimageidentityvideodeepfakesuspectapproachartifacts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

DeepFake detection has so far been dominated by ``artifact-driven'' methods and the detection performance significantly degrades when either the type of image artifacts is unknown or the artifacts are simply too hard to find. In this work, we present an alternative approach: Identity-Driven DeepFake Detection. Our approach takes as input the suspect image/video as well as the target identity information (a reference image or video). We output a decision on whether the identity in the suspect image/video is the same as the target identity. Our motivation is to prevent the most common and harmful DeepFakes that spread false information of a targeted person. The identity-based approach is fundamentally different in that it does not attempt to detect image artifacts. Instead, it focuses on whether the identity in the suspect image/video is true. To facilitate research on identity-based detection, we present a new large scale dataset ``Vox-DeepFake", in which each suspect content is associated with multiple reference images collected from videos of a target identity. We also present a simple identity-based detection algorithm called the OuterFace, which may serve as a baseline for further research. Even trained without fake videos, the OuterFace algorithm achieves superior detection accuracy and generalizes well to different DeepFake methods, and is robust with respect to video degradation techniques -- a performance not achievable with existing detection algorithms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Detecting AI-Generated Video: A Vision-Language Dual-View Survey

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AIGC-V detection should be treated as factual fidelity verification and organized by a four-layer vision-language dual-view taxonomy spanning cues, motion, cross-modal consistency, and world-level reasoning.

  2. Detecting Deepfake Talking Heads from Facial Biometric Anomalies

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A lightweight XGBoost classifier trained on statistical moments of pairwise ArcFace biometric similarities can distinguish real talking-head videos from face-swap and lip-sync deepfakes with around 95% accuracy on mat...

Pith tools