Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

#TulsaFlop: A Case Study of Algorithmically-Influenced Collective Action on TikTok

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.07716 v1 pith:MLPIIT42 submitted 2020-12-14 cs.HC cs.CYcs.SI

classification cs.HCcs.CYcs.SI
keywords videostiktokcall-to-actionactioncollectiveuserusersamplification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

When a re-election rally for the U.S. president drew smaller crowds than expected in Tulsa, Oklahoma, many people attributed the low turnout to collective action organized by TikTok users. Motivated by TikTok's surge in popularity and its growing sociopolitical implications, this work explores the role of TikTok's recommender algorithm in amplifying call-to-action videos that promoted collective action against the Tulsa rally. We analyze call-to-action videos from more than 600 TikTok users and compare the visibility (i.e. play count) of these videos with other videos published by the same users. Evidence suggests that Tulsa-related videos generally received more plays, and in some cases the amplification was dramatic. For example, one user's call-to-action video was played over 2 million times, but no other video by the user exceeded 100,000 plays, and the user had fewer than 20,000 followers. Statistical modeling suggests that the increased play count is explained by increased engagement rather than any systematic amplification of call-to-action videos. We conclude by discussing the implications of recommender algorithms amplifying sociopolitical messages, and motivate several promising areas for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior on TikTok: Challenges and Opportunities for Detection in a Video-First Ecosystem

    cs.SI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A TikTok-adapted network method surfaces clusters of likely coordinated accounts during the 2024 US election, but validation rests on manual inspection rather than a labeled benchmark.

  2. Algorithmic Collective Action with Two Collectives

    cs.CY 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    When two user collectives manipulate the same ML system simultaneously, their actions interact and can sharply reduce each other's effectiveness, with collective size mattering more than membership homogeneity in reco...

  3. 'Debunk-It-Yourself': Health Professionals' Strategies for Responding to Misinformation on TikTok

    cs.CR 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Health professionals on TikTok debunk nutrition and mental health misinformation through a shared five-step process driven by perceived harm, scientific evidence, and symmetric duet-style responses.

Pith tools