Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Giant X-ray and optical Bump in GRBs: evidence for fall-back accretion model

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 19 Dec 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The fall-back accretion model could well interpret the X-ray and optical bump for all candidates within a reasonable parameter space.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2012.12036 (version 1)
Pith IDAFY3LYN2, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHe Gao, Liangduan Liu, Lin Lan, Litao Zhao, Weihua Lei. "Giant X-ray and optical Bump in GRBs: evidence for fall-back accretion model." arXiv:2012.12036 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/AFY3LYN2
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,710 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.54 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.32 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The successful operation of dedicated detectors has brought us valuable information for understanding the central engine and the progenitor of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). For instance, the giant X-ray and optical bumps found in some long-duration GRBs (e.g. GRBs 121027A and 111209A) imply that some extended central engine activities, such as the late X-ray flares, are likely due to the fall-back of progenitor envelope materials. Here we systemically search for long GRBs that consist of a giant X-ray or optical bump from the Swift GRB sample, and eventually we find 19 new possible candidates. The fall-back accretion model could well interpret the X-ray and optical bump for all candidates within a reasonable parameter space. Six candidates showing simultaneous bump signatures in both X-ray and optical observations, which could be well fitted at the same time when scaling down the X-ray flux into optical by one order of magnitude, are consistent with the standard $F_{\nu}\propto\nu^{1/3}$ synchrotron spectrum. The typical fall-back radius is distributed around $10^{10}\rm-10^{12}$ cm, which is consistent with the typical radius of a Wolf-Rayet star. The peak fall-back accretion rate is in the range of $\sim 10^{-11}-10^{-4}M_{\odot} \ \text{s} ^{-1}$ at time $\sim10^{2}- 10^{5}~\rm s$, which is relatively easy to fulfill as long as the progenitor's metallicity is not too high. Combined with the sample we found, future studies of the mass supply rate for the progenitors with different mass, metallicity, and angular momentum distribution would help us to better constrain the progenitor properties of long GRBs.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The successful operation of dedicated detectors has brought us valuable information for understanding the central engine and the progenitor of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 For instance, the giant X-ray and optical bumps found in some long-duration GRBs (e.g. GRBs 121027A and 111209A) imply that some extended central engine activities, such as the late X-ray flares, are likely due to the fall-back of progenitor envelope materials. background 0.61 0.09 0.21 hedged possibility 1.00
s2 Here we systemically search for long GRBs that consist of a giant X-ray or optical bump from the Swift GRB sample, and eventually we find 19 new possible candidates. contribution 0.79 0.97 0.08 asserted 0.92
s3 The fall-back accretion model could well interpret the X-ray and optical bump for all candidates within a reasonable parameter space. interpretation 0.88 0.73 0.59 hedged possibility 0.99
s4 Six candidates showing simultaneous bump signatures in both X-ray and optical observations, which could be well fitted at the same time when scaling down the X-ray flux into optical by one order of magnitude, are consistent with the standard $F_{\nu}\propto\nu^{1/3}$ synchrotron spectrum. result 0.93 0.88 0.08 hedged possibility 0.94
s5 The typical fall-back radius is distributed around $10^{10}\rm-10^{12}$ cm, which is consistent with the typical radius of a Wolf-Rayet star. result 0.93 0.83 0.08 asserted 0.81
s6 The peak fall-back accretion rate is in the range of $\sim 10^{-11}-10^{-4}M_{\odot} \ \text{s} ^{-1}$ at time $\sim10^{2}- 10^{5}~\rm s$, which is relatively easy to fulfill as long as the progenitor's metallicity is not too high. result 0.92 0.76 0.09 asserted 0.84
s7 Combined with the sample we found, future studies of the mass supply rate for the progenitors with different mass, metallicity, and angular momentum distribution would help us to better constrain the progenitor properties of long GRBs. future work 1.00 0.32 0.08 hedged possibility 0.90

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.91 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The successful operation of dedicated detectors has brought us valuable information for understanding the central engine and the progenitor of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). For instance, the giant X-ray and optical bumps found in some long-duration GRBs (e.g. GRBs 121027A and 111209A) imply that some extended central engine activities, such as the late X-ray flares, are likely due to the fall-back of progenitor envelope materials. Here we systemically search for long GRBs that consist of a giant X-ray or optical bump from the Swift GRB sample, and eventually we find 19 new possible candidates. The fall-back accretion model could well interpret the X-ray and optical bump for all candidates within a reasonable parameter space. Six candidates showing simultaneous bump signatures in both X-ray and optical observations, which could be well fitted at the same time when scaling down the X-ray flux into optical by one order of magnitude, are consistent with the standard $F_{\nu}\propto\nu^{1/3}$ synchrotron spectrum. The typical fall-back radius is distributed around $10^{10}\rm-10^{12}$ cm, which is consistent with the typical radius of a Wolf-Rayet star. The peak fall-back accretion rate is in the range of $\sim 10^{-11}-10^{-4}M_{\odot} \ \text{s} ^{-1}$ at time $\sim10^{2}- 10^{5}~\rm s$, which is relatively easy to fulfill as long as the progenitor's metallicity is not too high. Combined with the sample we found, future studies of the mass supply rate for the progenitors with different mass, metallicity, and angular momentum distribution would help us to better constrain the progenitor properties of long GRBs.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.