REVIEW 2 cited by
Landau equation for self-gravitating classical and quantum particles: Application to dark matter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We develop the kinetic theory of classical and quantum particles (fermions and bosons) in gravitational interaction. The kinetic theory of quantum particles may have applications in the context of dark matter. For simplicity, we consider an infinite and spatially homogeneous system (or make a local approximation) and neglect collective effects. This leads to the quantum Landau equation derived heuristically in [Chavanis, Physica A 332, 89 (2004)]. We establish its main properties: conservation laws, $H$-theorem, equilibrium state, relaxation time, quantum diffusion and friction coefficients, quantum Rosenbluth potentials, self-consistent evolution, (thermal) bath approximation, quantum Fokker-Planck equation, quantum King model... For bosonic particles, the Landau equation can describe the process of Bose-Einstein condensation. We discuss the relation of our study with the works of [Levkov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 151301 (2018); Bar-Or et al., Astrophys. J. 871, 28 (2019)] on fuzzy dark matter halos and the formation of Bose stars and solitons.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Core-Halo Mass Relation in Cosmological Vector Dark Matter
Confirmed Proca-star cores in vector dark matter follow M_star ≈ 2.65 M_halo^0.64, with only about 10% of halos hosting a detectable core.
-
Bracketing the soliton-halo relation of ultralight dark matter
Numerical simulations and analytic equivalences show that the soliton-halo relation for ultralight dark matter is bracketed by the 1/2 relation as a lower bound and the 1/3 relation as an upper bound.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.