Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Leveraging GPT-2 for Classifying Spam Reviews with Limited Labeled Data via Adversarial Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.13400 v1 pith:KYPNJQC5 submitted 2020-12-24 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords datalabeledreviewsspamlimitedtrainingadversarialclassifying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Online reviews are a vital source of information when purchasing a service or a product. Opinion spammers manipulate these reviews, deliberately altering the overall perception of the service. Though there exists a corpus of online reviews, only a few have been labeled as spam or non-spam, making it difficult to train spam detection models. We propose an adversarial training mechanism leveraging the capabilities of Generative Pre-Training 2 (GPT-2) for classifying opinion spam with limited labeled data and a large set of unlabeled data. Experiments on TripAdvisor and YelpZip datasets show that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art techniques by at least 7% in terms of accuracy when labeled data is limited. The proposed model can also generate synthetic spam/non-spam reviews with reasonable perplexity, thereby, providing additional labeled data during training.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PhishingHook: Catching Phishing Ethereum Smart Contracts leveraging EVM Opcodes

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PhishingHook benchmarks 16 machine learning models that classify Ethereum smart contracts as phishing or benign from their bytecode opcodes, reporting about 90% average accuracy with Random Forest best at 93.6%.

Pith tools