Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Tutorial on Sparse Gaussian Processes and Variational Inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.13962 v14 pith:7MPMITX6 submitted 2020-12-27 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords inferenceexamplesproblemsapproximateposteriorframeworkgaussianpseudo-training
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Gaussian processes (GPs) provide a framework for Bayesian inference that can offer principled uncertainty estimates for a large range of problems. For example, if we consider regression problems with Gaussian likelihoods, a GP model enjoys a posterior in closed form. However, identifying the posterior GP scales cubically with the number of training examples and requires to store all examples in memory. In order to overcome these obstacles, sparse GPs have been proposed that approximate the true posterior GP with pseudo-training examples. Importantly, the number of pseudo-training examples is user-defined and enables control over computational and memory complexity. In the general case, sparse GPs do not enjoy closed-form solutions and one has to resort to approximate inference. In this context, a convenient choice for approximate inference is variational inference (VI), where the problem of Bayesian inference is cast as an optimization problem -- namely, to maximize a lower bound of the log marginal likelihood. This paves the way for a powerful and versatile framework, where pseudo-training examples are treated as optimization arguments of the approximate posterior that are jointly identified together with hyperparameters of the generative model (i.e. prior and likelihood). The framework can naturally handle a wide scope of supervised learning problems, ranging from regression with heteroscedastic and non-Gaussian likelihoods to classification problems with discrete labels, but also problems with multidimensional labels. The purpose of this tutorial is to provide access to the basic matter for readers without prior knowledge in both GPs and VI. A proper exposition to the subject enables also access to more recent advances (like importance-weighted VI as well as interdomain, multioutput and deep GPs) that can serve as an inspiration for new research ideas.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 12 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. No-Regret Gaussian Process Optimization of Time-Varying Functions

    stat.ML 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A windowed sparse GP-UCB with DPP-selected expert re-queries achieves sublinear dynamic regret using o(1) extra queries per round on average, and a Fano lower bound shows Ω(T^{α/(α+1)}) queries are needed in fast-drif...

  2. New Bounds for Sparse Variational Gaussian Processes

    cs.LG 2025-02 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Replacing the conditional GP prior inside sparse variational inference with a Gaussian sharing its mean but using diagonal, analytically optimal variance corrections yields a strictly tighter evidence lower bound at u...

Pith tools