Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Identifying Authorship Style in Malicious Binaries: Techniques, Challenges & Datasets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.06124 v2 pith:WN7ZRTWG submitted 2021-01-15 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords styleadversarialauthorshipbinarieschallengesdatasetsidentifymalicious
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Attributing a piece of malware to its creator typically requires threat intelligence. Binary attribution increases the level of difficulty as it mostly relies upon the ability to disassemble binaries to identify authorship style. Our survey explores malicious author style and the adversarial techniques used by them to remain anonymous. We examine the adversarial impact on the state-of-the-art methods. We identify key findings and explore the open research challenges. To mitigate the lack of ground truth datasets in this domain, we publish alongside this survey the largest and most diverse meta-information dataset of 15,660 malware labeled to 164 threat actor groups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Technique Identification and Threat-Actor Attribution using LLMs and Embedding Models

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GPT-4's TTP lists match human MITRE labels only 39% by Jaccard similarity, yet an embedding-based attribution model ranks the correct threat actor 7.55 on average out of 29, beating the random baseline of 15.

Pith tools