REVIEW 3 cited by
Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recommender systems (RSs) have become an inseparable part of our everyday lives. They help us find our favorite items to purchase, our friends on social networks, and our favorite movies to watch. Traditionally, the recommendation problem was considered to be a classification or prediction problem, but it is now widely agreed that formulating it as a sequential decision problem can better reflect the user-system interaction. Therefore, it can be formulated as a Markov decision process (MDP) and be solved by reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. Unlike traditional recommendation methods, including collaborative filtering and content-based filtering, RL is able to handle the sequential, dynamic user-system interaction and to take into account the long-term user engagement. Although the idea of using RL for recommendation is not new and has been around for about two decades, it was not very practical, mainly because of scalability problems of traditional RL algorithms. However, a new trend has emerged in the field since the introduction of deep reinforcement learning (DRL), which made it possible to apply RL to the recommendation problem with large state and action spaces. In this paper, a survey on reinforcement learning based recommender systems (RLRSs) is presented. Our aim is to present an outlook on the field and to provide the reader with a fairly complete knowledge of key concepts of the field. We first recognize and illustrate that RLRSs can be generally classified into RL- and DRL-based methods. Then, we propose an RLRS framework with four components, i.e., state representation, policy optimization, reward formulation, and environment building, and survey RLRS algorithms accordingly. We highlight emerging topics and depict important trends using various graphs and tables. Finally, we discuss important aspects and challenges that can be addressed in the future.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Self-Evolving Recommendation System: End-To-End Autonomous Model Optimization With LLM Agents
LLM agents acting as ML engineers autonomously generated optimizer, architecture, and reward changes that produced small live metric gains at YouTube when deployed through a dual offline/online loop.
-
PPO-Q: Proximal Policy Optimization with Parametrized Quantum Policies or Values
PPO-Q combines a small parameterized quantum circuit with pre-encoding and post-processing neural networks inside the PPO algorithm, matching classical performance on eight tasks with fewer parameters and solving Bipe...
-
Defining the scope of AI regulations
Regulators should define AI regulation scope by specific risk sources (technical approaches, applications, capabilities) rather than by the vague term AI.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.