REVIEW 1 cited by
Leveraging Peer Review in Visualization Education: A Proposal for a New Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Leveraging Peer Review in Visualization Education: A Proposal for a New Model
read the original abstract
In visualization education, both science and humanities, the literature is often divided into two parts: the design aspect and the analysis of the visualization. However, we find limited discussion on how to motivate and engage visualization students in the classroom. In the field of Writing Studies, researchers develop tools and frameworks for student peer review of writing. Based on the literature review from the field of Writing Studies, this paper proposes a new framework to implement visualization peer review in the classroom to engage today's students. This framework can be customized for incremental and double-blind review to inspire students and reinforce critical thinking about visualization.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Read, Critique, or Sketch? Investigating Alternative Visualization Literacy Assessment Modalities
Sketching and think-aloud critique assessments distinguish visualization expertise levels better than multiple-choice tests and capture partially distinct literacy skills.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.