REVIEW 1 cited by
GPU-Accelerated Optimizer-Aware Evaluation of Submodular Exemplar Clustering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The optimization of submodular functions constitutes a viable way to perform clustering. Strong approximation guarantees and feasible optimization w.r.t. streaming data make this clustering approach favorable. Technically, submodular functions map subsets of data to real values, which indicate how "representative" a specific subset is. Optimal sets might then be used to partition the data space and to infer clusters. Exemplar-based clustering is one of the possible submodular functions, but suffers from high computational complexity. However, for practical applications, the particular real-time or wall-clock run-time is decisive. In this work, we present a novel way to evaluate this particular function on GPUs, which keeps the necessities of optimizers in mind and reduces wall-clock run-time. To discuss our GPU algorithm, we investigated both the impact of different run-time critical problem properties, like data dimensionality and the number of data points in a subset, and the influence of required floating-point precision. In reproducible experiments, our GPU algorithm was able to achieve competitive speedups of up to 72x depending on whether multi-threaded computation on CPUs was used for comparison and the type of floating-point precision required. Half-precision GPU computation led to large speedups of up to 452x compared to single-precision, single-thread CPU computations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Scalable Submodular Policy Optimization via Pruned Submodularity Graph
SGPO prunes trajectory states via a submodularity graph, then runs a policy gradient update, but its claimed constant-factor guarantee is not proven and conflicts with the paper's inapproximability theorem.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.