Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Two-phase approaches to optimal model-based design of experiments: how many experiments and which ones?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.09219 v1 pith:M6GS6VBF submitted 2021-01-22 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords experimentsapproachesdesignmodelmodel-basedstrategieschemicalengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Model-based experimental design is attracting increasing attention in chemical process engineering. Typically, an iterative procedure is pursued: an approximate model is devised, prescribed experiments are then performed and the resulting data is exploited to refine the model. To help to reduce the cost of trial-and-error approaches, strategies for model-based design of experiments suggest experimental points where the expected gain in information for the model is the largest. It requires the resolution of a large nonlinear, generally nonconvex, optimization problem, whose solution may greatly depend on the starting point. We present two discretization strategies that can assist the experimenter in setting the number of relevant experiments and performing an optimal selection, and we compare them against two pattern-based strategies that are independent of the problem. The validity of the approaches is demonstrated on an academic example and two test problems from chemical engineering including a vapor liquid equilibrium and reaction kinetics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools