Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Outflow from super-Eddington flow: where it originates from and how much impact it gives?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.11028 v2 pith:LQPCJE3Y submitted 2021-01-26 astro-ph.HE

Outflow from super-Eddington flow: where it originates from and how much impact it gives?

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords outflowluminositymassmuchoriginatesaccretionblackboundary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

It is widely believed that super-Eddington accretion flow can produce powerful outflow, but where it originates from and how much mass and energy are carried away to which directions? To answer to these questions, we newly perform a large-box, two-dimensional radiation hydrodynamic simulation, paying special attention lest the results should depend on adopted initial and boundary conditions. We could achieve a quasi-steady state in an unprecedentedly large range, $r=2~r_{\rm S}$-$600~r_{\rm S}$ (with $r_{\rm S}$ being the Schwarzschild radius) from the black hole. The accretion rate onto the central $10 ~M_{\odot}$ black hole is $\dot{M}_{\rm BH} \sim 180 ~L_{\rm Edd}/c^{2}$, whereas the mass outflow rate is ${\dot M}_{\rm outflow} \sim 24 ~L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$ (where $L_{\rm Edd}$ and $c$ are the Eddington luminosity and the speed of light, respectively). The ratio (${\dot M}_{\rm outflow}/{\dot M}_{\rm BH} \sim 0.14$) is much less than those reported previously. By careful inspection we find that most of outflowing gas which reach the outer boundary originates from the region at $R\lesssim140~r_{\rm S}$, while gas at $140~r_{\rm S}$-$230 ~r_{\rm S}$ forms failed outflow. Therefore, significant outflow occurs inside the trapping radius $\sim 450 ~r_{\rm S}$. The mechanical energy flux (or mass flux) reaches its maximum in the direction of $\sim 15^\circ$ ($\sim 80^\circ$) from the rotation axis. The total mechanical luminosity is $L_{\rm mec}\sim 0.16~L_{\rm Edd}$, while the isotropic X-ray luminosity varies from $L_{\rm X}^{\rm ISO}\sim 2.9~L_{\rm Edd}$, (for a face-on observer) to $\sim 2.1~L_{\rm Edd}$ (for a nearly edge-on observer). The power ratio is $L_{\rm mec}/L_{\rm X}^{\rm ISO}\sim 0.05$-$0.08$, in good agreement with the observations of Ultra-Luminous X-ray sources surrounded by optical nebulae.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients as "Failed" Gravitational-wave Sources: Helium Core$-$Black Hole Mergers Following Delayed Dynamical Instability

    astro-ph.HE 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    Luminous fast blue optical transients may be the aftermath of a black hole merging with a companion star's helium core after prolonged mass transfer, producing a super-Eddington accretion flare.

  2. Effects of Bethe-Heitler pair production in ultraluminous X-ray sources

    astro-ph.HE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Secondary pairs from Bethe-Heitler interactions of relativistic protons in ULX funnels can produce 0.1-100 MeV emission at 10^34 to 10^38 erg/s, a testable hadronic signature.