Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Calibrating and Improving Graph Contrastive Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.11525 v2 pith:3KR6IDGX submitted 2021-01-27 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords contrastivegraphdownstreamlearningtasksperformancealgorithmscontrast-reg
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph contrastive learning algorithms have demonstrated remarkable success in various applications such as node classification, link prediction, and graph clustering. However, in unsupervised graph contrastive learning, some contrastive pairs may contradict the truths in downstream tasks and thus the decrease of losses on these pairs undesirably harms the performance in the downstream tasks. To assess the discrepancy between the prediction and the ground-truth in the downstream tasks for these contrastive pairs, we adapt the expected calibration error (ECE) to graph contrastive learning. The analysis of ECE motivates us to propose a novel regularization method, Contrast-Reg, to ensure that decreasing the contrastive loss leads to better performance in the downstream tasks. As a plug-in regularizer, Contrast-Reg effectively improves the performance of existing graph contrastive learning algorithms. We provide both theoretical and empirical results to demonstrate the effectiveness of Contrast-Reg in enhancing the generalizability of the Graph Neural Network(GNN) model and improving the performance of graph contrastive algorithms with different similarity definitions and encoder backbones across various downstream tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Graph Prompting for Graph Learning Models: Recent Advances and Future Directions

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of graph prompting methods that categorizes them by the stage at which prompts are applied: data, representation, or task.

  2. Learning Causality for Modern Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A thesis compiling six papers that use causal invariance to improve graph neural networks' out-of-distribution generalization, interpretability, and robustness.

Pith tools