REVIEW
Beyond Equi-joins: Ranking, Enumeration and Factorization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Beyond Equi-joins: Ranking, Enumeration and Factorization
read the original abstract
We study theta-joins in general and join predicates with conjunctions and disjunctions of inequalities in particular, focusing on ranked enumeration where the answers are returned incrementally in an order dictated by a given ranking function. Our approach achieves strong time and space complexity properties: with $n$ denoting the number of tuples in the database, we guarantee for acyclic full join queries with inequality conditions that for every value of $k$, the $k$ top-ranked answers are returned in $\mathcal{O}(n \operatorname{polylog} n + k \log k)$ time. This is within a polylogarithmic factor of $\mathcal{O}(n + k \log k)$, i.e., the best known complexity for equi-joins, and even of $\mathcal{O}(n+k)$, i.e., the time it takes to look at the input and return $k$ answers in any order. Our guarantees extend to join queries with selections and many types of projections (namely those called "free-connex" queries and those that use bag semantics). Remarkably, they hold even when the number of join results is $n^\ell$ for a join of $\ell$ relations. The key ingredient is a novel $\mathcal{O}(n \operatorname{polylog} n)$-size factorized representation of the query output, which is constructed on-the-fly for a given query and database. In addition to providing the first non-trivial theoretical guarantees beyond equi-joins, we show in an experimental study that our ranked-enumeration approach is also memory-efficient and fast in practice, beating the running time of state-of-the-art database systems by orders of magnitude.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.