RECORD
The effects of different Type Ia SN yields on Milky Way chemical evolution
Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 29 Jan 2021
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The comparison of chemical evolution model results with observations suggests that a combination of near-Chandrasekar and sub-Chandrasekar yields is necessary to reproduce the data of V, Cr, Mn and Ni, with different fractions depending on the adopted massive stars stellar yields.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We study the effect of different Type Ia SN nucleosynthesis prescriptions on the Milky Way chemical evolution. To this aim, we run detailed one-infall and two-infall chemical evolution models, adopting a large compilation of yield sets corresponding to different white dwarf progenitors (near-Chandrasekar and sub-Chandrasekar) taken from the literature. We adopt a fixed delay time distribution function for Type Ia SNe , in order to avoid degeneracies in the analysis of the different nucleosynthesis channels. We also combine yields for different Type Ia SN progenitors in order to test the contribution to chemical evolution of different Type Ia SN channels. The results of the models are compared with recent LTE and NLTE observational data. We find that "classical" W7 and WDD2 models produce Fe masses and [$\alpha$/Fe] abundance patterns similar to more recent and physical near-Chandrasekar and sub- Chandrasekar models. For Fe-peak elements, we find that the results strongly depend either on the white dwarf explosion mechanism (deflagration-to-detonation, pure deflagration, double detonation) or on the initial white dwarf conditions (central density, explosion pattern). The comparison of chemical evolution model results with observations suggests that a combination of near-Chandrasekar and sub-Chandrasekar yields is necessary to reproduce the data of V, Cr, Mn and Ni, with different fractions depending on the adopted massive stars stellar yields. This comparison also suggests that NLTE and singly ionised abundances should be definitely preferred when dealing with most of Fe-peak elements at low metallicity.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We study the effect of different Type Ia SN nucleosynthesis prescriptions on the Milky Way chemical evolution. | contribution 0.97 | 0.89 | 0.02 | asserted 0.61 |
| s1 | To this aim, we run detailed one-infall and two-infall chemical evolution models, adopting a large compilation of yield sets corresponding to different white dwarf progenitors (near-Chandrasekar and sub-Chandrasekar) taken from the literature. | method 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.02 | asserted 0.87 |
| s2 | We adopt a fixed delay time distribution function for Type Ia SNe , in order to avoid degeneracies in the analysis of the different nucleosynthesis channels. | method 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.02 | asserted 0.98 |
| s3 | We also combine yields for different Type Ia SN progenitors in order to test the contribution to chemical evolution of different Type Ia SN channels. | method 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.03 | asserted 0.90 |
| s4 | The results of the models are compared with recent LTE and NLTE observational data. | method 0.95 | 0.67 | 0.02 | asserted 0.95 |
| s5 | We find that "classical" W7 and WDD2 models produce Fe masses and [$\alpha$/Fe] abundance patterns similar to more recent and physical near-Chandrasekar and sub- Chandrasekar models. | result 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.20 | asserted 1.00 |
| s6 | For Fe-peak elements, we find that the results strongly depend either on the white dwarf explosion mechanism (deflagration-to-detonation, pure deflagration, double detonation) or on the initial white dwarf conditions (central density, explosion pattern). | result 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
| s7 | The comparison of chemical evolution model results with observations suggests that a combination of near-Chandrasekar and sub-Chandrasekar yields is necessary to reproduce the data of V, Cr, Mn and Ni, with different fractions depending on the adopted massive stars stellar yields. | result 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.53 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
| s8 | This comparison also suggests that NLTE and singly ionised abundances should be definitely preferred when dealing with most of Fe-peak elements at low metallicity. | interpretation 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.14 | hedged possibility 0.79 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We study the effect of different Type Ia SN nucleosynthesis prescriptions on the Milky Way chemical evolution. To this aim, we run detailed one-infall and two-infall chemical evolution models, adopting a large compilation of yield sets corresponding to different white dwarf progenitors (near-Chandrasekar and sub-Chandrasekar) taken from the literature. We adopt a fixed delay time distribution function for Type Ia SNe , in order to avoid degeneracies in the analysis of the different nucleosynthesis channels. We also combine yields for different Type Ia SN progenitors in order to test the contribution to chemical evolution of different Type Ia SN channels. The results of the models are compared with recent LTE and NLTE observational data. We find that "classical" W7 and WDD2 models produce Fe masses and [$\alpha$/Fe] abundance patterns similar to more recent and physical near-Chandrasekar and sub- Chandrasekar models. For Fe-peak elements, we find that the results strongly depend either on the white dwarf explosion mechanism (deflagration-to-detonation, pure deflagration, double detonation) or on the initial white dwarf conditions (central density, explosion pattern). The comparison of chemical evolution model results with observations suggests that a combination of near-Chandrasekar and sub-Chandrasekar yields is necessary to reproduce the data of V, Cr, Mn and Ni, with different fractions depending on the adopted massive stars stellar yields. This comparison also suggests that NLTE and singly ionised abundances should be definitely preferred when dealing with most of Fe-peak elements at low metallicity.
Human review
How the literature uses it
6 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences
Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label
Compares with it 1 paper
-
This is in contrast with the case of binary-stripped stars, which produce Cr in amounts comparable to Fe, in better agreement with most commonly adopted yield prescriptions in the literature (see also [ref] ).
The effects of yields from binary massive stars as functions of metallicity · Chromium · 0.83
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
These three elements are synthesised by means of different processes and stellar sources / timescales: Mg is mainly produced by hydrostatic burning in massive stars [ref] , Si is made during explosive burning in massive stars with non-negligible contribution from Type Ia ( [ref] and references therein), and Ni is primarily produced by Type Ia SNe ( [ref] and references therein).
The chemical DNA of the Magellanic Clouds VI. Origin and evolution of neutron-capture elements in the SMC · $α$ and Fe-peak elements abundance patterns · 0.84
-
For a more in depth exploration of the impact of different type Ia SN yields on MW chemical evolution see the recent work by [ref] .
The challenge of simultaneously matching the observed diversity of chemical abundance patterns in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations · Metallicity distribution · 0.91
What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label
Cites as background 1 paper
-
Nonetheless, the physics governing SNe Ia is still largely debated (see [ref] for a review).
Type Ia Supernova Sub-classes and Progenitor Origin · Introduction · 0.97
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.