Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Airport Capacity and Performance in Europe -- A study of transport economics, service quality and sustainability

General Economics · Submitted 4 Feb 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The interest lies primarily in the question, which key figures can best measure the perception of quality of service from the point of view of the passenger for the services at an airport.

how it is stated · asserted 0.71 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2102.02379 (version 1)
Pith IDJZYVCIK6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBranko Bubalo. "Airport Capacity and Performance in Europe -- A study of transport economics, service quality and sustainability." arXiv:2102.02379 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/JZYVCIK6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,915 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.26 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The purpose of this dissertation is to present an overview of the operational and financial performance of airports in Europe. In benchmarking studies, airports are assessed and compared with other airports based on key indicators from a technical and an economic point of view. The interest lies primarily in the question, which key figures can best measure the perception of quality of service from the point of view of the passenger for the services at an airport.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The purpose of this dissertation is to present an overview of the operational and financial performance of airports in Europe. contribution 0.96 0.40 0.04 asserted 0.90
s1 In benchmarking studies, airports are assessed and compared with other airports based on key indicators from a technical and an economic point of view. background 0.70 0.09 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 The interest lies primarily in the question, which key figures can best measure the perception of quality of service from the point of view of the passenger for the services at an airport. background 0.46 0.10 0.04 asserted 0.71

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.63 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.83.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The purpose of this dissertation is to present an overview of the operational and financial performance of airports in Europe. In benchmarking studies, airports are assessed and compared with other airports based on key indicators from a technical and an economic point of view. The interest lies primarily in the question, which key figures can best measure the perception of quality of service from the point of view of the passenger for the services at an airport.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.