Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

PipeTransformer: Automated Elastic Pipelining for Distributed Training of Transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.03161 v2 pith:UWZJ7SSC submitted 2021-02-05 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords pipetransformertraininglayersmodelspipeliningtransformeractiveautomated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The size of Transformer models is growing at an unprecedented pace. It has only taken less than one year to reach trillion-level parameters after the release of GPT-3 (175B). Training such models requires both substantial engineering efforts and enormous computing resources, which are luxuries most research teams cannot afford. In this paper, we propose PipeTransformer, which leverages automated and elastic pipelining and data parallelism for efficient distributed training of Transformer models. PipeTransformer automatically adjusts the pipelining and data parallelism by identifying and freezing some layers during the training, and instead allocates resources for training of the remaining active layers. More specifically, PipeTransformer dynamically excludes converged layers from the pipeline, packs active layers into fewer GPUs, and forks more replicas to increase data-parallel width. We evaluate PipeTransformer using Vision Transformer (ViT) on ImageNet and BERT on GLUE and SQuAD datasets. Our results show that PipeTransformer attains a 2.4 fold speedup compared to the state-of-the-art baseline. We also provide various performance analyses for a more comprehensive understanding of our algorithmic and system-wise design. We also develop open-sourced flexible APIs for PipeTransformer, which offer a clean separation among the freeze algorithm, model definitions, and training accelerations, hence allowing it to be applied to other algorithms that require similar freezing strategies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Analysis of Layer-Freezing Strategies for Enhanced Transfer Learning in YOLO Architectures

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Freezing the first four blocks or the whole backbone of YOLOv8/YOLOv10 can match or beat full fine-tuning while using less GPU memory, but aggressive freezing fails on heavily augmented single-class data.

  2. Compute Can't Handle the Truth: Why Communication Tax Prioritizes Memory and Interconnects in Modern AI Infrastructure

    cs.DC 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A CXL-based disaggregated memory architecture with hybrid XLink interconnects is proposed and prototyped, claiming large speedups for memory-bound AI and HPC workloads.

Pith tools