Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Reassessment of the Quasi-Simultaneous Arrival Effect in Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.04253 v1 pith:6RDED2MR submitted 2021-02-02 physics.ins-det

A Reassessment of the Quasi-Simultaneous Arrival Effect in Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

classification physics.ins-det
keywords secondarycorrectiondistributionmodelmultiplepoissonarrivalarrivals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Quasi-simultaneous arrival (QSA) effects in secondary ion mass spectrometry can create mass-indepedent inaccuracies in isotope measurements when using electron multiplier detectors (EMs). The simple Poisson statistical model of QSA does not explain most experimental data. We present pulse-height distributions (PHDs) and time-series measurements to better study QSA. Our data show that PHDs and the distribution of multiple arrivals on the EM are not consistent with the Poisson model. Multiple arrivals are over-dispersed compared to Poisson and are closer to a negative binomial distribution. Through an emission-transmission-detection model we show that the QSA correction depends on the non-Poisson emission of multiple secondary ions, the secondary ion energy distribution, and other factors, making an analytical correction impractical. A standards-based correction for QSA is the best approach, and we show the proper way to calculate standards-normalized $\delta$ values to minimize the effect of QSA.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.