REVIEW 1 cited by
Capturing Label Distribution: A Case Study in NLI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study estimating inherent human disagreement (annotation label distribution) in natural language inference task. Post-hoc smoothing of the predicted label distribution to match the expected label entropy is very effective. Such simple manipulation can reduce KL divergence by almost half, yet will not improve majority label prediction accuracy or learn label distributions. To this end, we introduce a small amount of examples with multiple references into training. We depart from the standard practice of collecting a single reference per each training example, and find that collecting multiple references can achieve better accuracy under the fixed annotation budget. Lastly, we provide rich analyses comparing these two methods for improving label distribution estimation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Metric-Dependent Annotation Saturation for Learning from Label Distributions
Annotation saturation in learning from label distributions for NLI is metric-dependent, with KL divergence saturating at lower annotator counts (~10) than entropy correlation (20-50), and soft labels providing superio...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.