REVIEW 1 cited by
BPFContain: Fixing the Soft Underbelly of Container Security
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Linux containers currently provide limited isolation guarantees. While containers separate namespaces and partition resources, the patchwork of mechanisms used to ensure separation cannot guarantee consistent security semantics. Even worse, attempts to ensure complete coverage results in a mishmash of policies that are difficult to understand or audit. Here we present BPFContain, a new container confinement mechanism designed to integrate with existing container management systems. BPFContain combines a simple yet flexible policy language with an eBPF-based implementation that allows for deployment on virtually any Linux system running a recent kernel. In this paper, we present BPFContain's policy language, describe its current implementation as integrated into docker, and present benchmarks comparing it with current container confinement technologies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Docker under Siege: Securing Containers in the Modern Era
A narrative review of Docker security best practices that adds no original data, experiments, or new techniques.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.