REVIEW 1 cited by
On the advantages of stochastic encoders
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Stochastic encoders have been used in rate-distortion theory and neural compression because they can be easier to handle. However, in performance comparisons with deterministic encoders they often do worse, suggesting that noise in the encoding process may generally be a bad idea. It is poorly understood if and when stochastic encoders do better than deterministic encoders. In this paper we provide one illustrative example which shows that stochastic encoders can significantly outperform the best deterministic encoders. Our toy example suggests that stochastic encoders may be particularly useful in the regime of "perfect perceptual quality".
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Gap Between Principle and Practice of Lossy Image Coding
The paper attributes the gap between ideal and practical lossy image coding to five effects, and reports an estimated rate-distortion upper bound that beats VTM by up to 35 percent on Kodak.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.