Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Deep inelastic scattering as a probe of entanglement: confronting experimental data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.09773 v2 pith:YPF3M32J submitted 2021-02-19 hep-ph hep-ex

classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords dipolesfunctionregionsmallcolor-singletcurrententanglemententropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Parton distributions can be defined in terms of the entropy of entanglement between the spatial region probed by deep inelastic scattering (DIS) and the rest of the proton. For very small $x$, the proton becomes a maximally entangled state. This approach leads to a simple relation $S = \ln N $ between the average number $N$ of color-singlet dipoles in the proton wave function and the entropy of the produced hadronic state $S$. At small $x$, the multiplicity of dipoles is given by the gluon structure function, $N = x G(x,Q^2)$. Recently, the H1 Collaboration analyzed the entropy of the produced hadronic state in DIS, and studied its relation to the gluon structure function; poor agreement with the predicted relation was found. In this letter we argue that a more accurate account of the number of color-singlet dipoles in the kinematics of H1 experiment (where hadrons are detected in the current fragmentation region) is given not by $xG(x,Q^2)$ but by the sea quark structure function $x\Sigma(x,Q^2)$. Sea quarks originate from the splitting of gluons, so at small $x$ $x\Sigma(x,Q^2)\,\sim\, xG(x,Q^2)$, but in the current fragmentation region this proportionality is distorted by the contribution of the quark-antiquark pair produced by the virtual photon splitting. In addition, the multiplicity of color-singlet dipoles in the current fragmentation region is quite small, and one needs to include $\sim 1/N$ corrections to $S= \ln N$ asymptotic formula. Taking both of these modifications into account, we find that the data from the H1 Collaboration in fact agree well with the prediction based on entanglement.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum entanglement within quarkonium

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quark-antiquark entanglement entropy in quarkonium is derived from light-front wave functions, reduces to the Shannon entropy of TMDs, and shows strong polarization dependence for spin-1 mesons.

  2. Higher-order local constraints from reciprocal symmetry and entanglement entropy of charged-particle multiplicity distributions in $pp$ collisions

    hep-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The reciprocal symmetry of the KNO-violating term yields the new constraint δ₃=0 at n=⟨n⟩ (untestable at present precision), fails globally at 13 TeV, and the derived entropy S=ln⟨n⟩+I₀−½∫e^{-z}f_s²dz matches ATLAS da...

  3. Investigating QCD Dynamical Entropy in high-energy nuclear collisions

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using geometric scaling and Glauber-Gribov nuclear gluon distributions, the authors find that the QCD dynamical entropy in proton-nucleus collisions is essentially independent of the atomic mass number A, while the en...

  4. Charged particle multiplicity distributions derived from the Principle of Maximal Entropy

    hep-ph 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper claims charged particle multiplicity distributions follow from maximizing Shannon entropy with a fixed mean, yielding exponential tails and, after Poisson-Gamma mixing, the negative binomial distribution.

Pith tools