REVIEW 4 cited by
Progressive Transformer-Based Generation of Radiology Reports
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Inspired by Curriculum Learning, we propose a consecutive (i.e., image-to-text-to-text) generation framework where we divide the problem of radiology report generation into two steps. Contrary to generating the full radiology report from the image at once, the model generates global concepts from the image in the first step and then reforms them into finer and coherent texts using a transformer architecture. We follow the transformer-based sequence-to-sequence paradigm at each step. We improve upon the state-of-the-art on two benchmark datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Learnable Retrieval Enhanced Visual-Text Alignment and Fusion for Radiology Report Generation
REVTAF, a retrieval-augmented radiology report generator, reports average gains of 7.4 points on MIMIC-CXR and 2.9 points on IU X-Ray across nine metrics.
-
Multimodal Large Language Models for Medical Report Generation via Customized Prompt Tuning
MRG-LLM creates image-specific prompts by applying learned shifts and scales to a set of base prompts, improving automated radiology report generation on IU X-ray and MIMIC-CXR.
-
MCA-RG: Enhancing LLMs with Medical Concept Alignment for Radiology Report Generation
MCA-RG uses concept alignment, contrastive learning, matching loss, and feature gating to generate radiology reports, reporting SOTA on MIMIC-CXR and CheXpert Plus.
-
Automated Radiology Report Generation Based on Topic-Keyword Semantic Guidance
A topic-keyword semantic guidance framework improves automated radiology report generation and reaches state-of-the-art on two public chest X-ray benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.