Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the stellar clustering and architecture of planetary systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.12346 v1 pith:PSBF52V2 submitted 2021-02-24 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords planetsstarsorbitingarchitectureclusterplanetarysampleshaping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Revealing the mechanisms shaping the architecture of planetary systems is crucial for our understanding of their formation and evolution. In this context, it has been recently proposed that stellar clustering might be the key in shaping the orbital architecture of exoplanets. The main goal of this work is to explore the factors that shape the orbits of planets. We used a homogeneous sample of relatively young FGK dwarf stars with RV detected planets and tested the hypothesis that their association to phase space (position-velocity) over-densities ('cluster' stars) and under-densities ('field' stars) impacts the orbital periods of planets. When controlling for the host star properties, on a sample of 52 planets orbiting around 'cluster' stars and 15 planets orbiting around 'field' star, we found no significant difference in the period distribution of planets orbiting these two populations of stars. By considering an extended sample of 73 planets orbiting around 'cluster' stars and 25 planets orbiting 'field' stars, a significant different in the planetary period distributions emerged. However, the hosts associated to stellar under-densities appeared to be significantly older than their 'cluster' counterparts. This did not allow us to conclude whether the planetary architecture is related to age, environment, or both. We further studied a sample of planets orbiting 'cluster' stars to study the mechanism responsible for the shaping of orbits of planets in similar environments. We could not identify a parameter that can unambiguously be responsible for the orbital architecture of massive planets, perhaps, indicating the complexity of the issue. Conclusions. Increased number of planets in clusters and in over-density environments will help to build large and unbiased samples which will then allow to better understand the dominant processes shaping the orbits of planets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools