REVIEW 1 cited by
FedPower: Privacy-Preserving Distributed Eigenspace Estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Eigenspace estimation is fundamental in machine learning and statistics, which has found applications in PCA, dimension reduction, and clustering, among others. The modern machine learning community usually assumes that data come from and belong to different organizations. The low communication power and the possible privacy breaches of data make the computation of eigenspace challenging. To address these challenges, we propose a class of algorithms called \textsf{FedPower} within the federated learning (FL) framework. \textsf{FedPower} leverages the well-known power method by alternating multiple local power iterations and a global aggregation step, thus improving communication efficiency. In the aggregation, we propose to weight each local eigenvector matrix with {\it Orthogonal Procrustes Transformation} (OPT) for better alignment. To ensure strong privacy protection, we add Gaussian noise in each iteration by adopting the notion of \emph{differential privacy} (DP). We provide convergence bounds for \textsf{FedPower} that are composed of different interpretable terms corresponding to the effects of Gaussian noise, parallelization, and random sampling of local machines. Additionally, we conduct experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Decentralized Differentially Private Power Method
A decentralized power method for PCA with row-wise data partitioning is augmented with Gaussian noise to claim differential privacy; the algorithm and experiments are plausible but the privacy proof is incomplete.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.