Pith. Sign in

RECORD

On tangencies among planar curves with an application to coloring L-shapes

Combinatorics · Submitted 4 Mar 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We prove that there are $O(n)$ tangencies among any set of $n$ red and blue planar curves in which every pair of curves intersects at most once and no two curves of the same color intersect.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2103.02960 (version 1)
Pith IDEHSLQTWR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBal\'azs Keszegh, D\"om\"ot\"or P\'alv\"olgyi, Eyal Ackerman. "On tangencies among planar curves with an application to coloring L-shapes." arXiv:2103.02960 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/EHSLQTWR
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,104 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.60 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We prove that there are $O(n)$ tangencies among any set of $n$ red and blue planar curves in which every pair of curves intersects at most once and no two curves of the same color intersect. If every pair of curves may intersect more than once, then it is known that the number of tangencies could be super-linear. However, we show that a linear upper bound still holds if we replace tangencies by pairwise disjoint connecting curves that all intersect a certain face of the arrangement of red and blue curves. The latter result has an application for the following problem studied by Keller, Rok and Smorodinsky [Disc.\ Comput.\ Geom.\ (2020)] in the context of \emph{conflict-free coloring} of \emph{string graphs}: what is the minimum number of colors that is always sufficient to color the members of any family of $n$ \emph{grounded L-shapes} such that among the L-shapes intersected by any L-shape there is one with a unique color? They showed that $O(\log^3 n)$ colors are always sufficient and that $\Omega(\log n)$ colors are sometimes necessary. We improve their upper bound to $O(\log^2 n)$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We prove that there are $O(n)$ tangencies among any set of $n$ red and blue planar curves in which every pair of curves intersects at most once and no two curves of the same color intersect. result 0.89 0.96 0.77 asserted 1.00
s1 If every pair of curves may intersect more than once, then it is known that the number of tangencies could be super-linear. background 0.97 0.06 0.03 hedged possibility 0.70
s2 However, we show that a linear upper bound still holds if we replace tangencies by pairwise disjoint connecting curves that all intersect a certain face of the arrangement of red and blue curves. result 0.76 0.95 0.18 asserted 1.00
s3 The latter result has an application for the following problem studied by Keller, Rok and Smorodinsky [Disc.\ Comput.\ Geom.\ (2020)] in the context of \emph{conflict-free coloring} of \emph{string graphs}: what is the minimum number of colors that is always sufficient to color the members of any family of $n$ \emph{grounded L-shapes} such that among the L-shapes intersected by any L-shape there is one with a unique color? interpretation 0.45 0.24 0.08 asserted 0.94
s4 They showed that $O(\log^3 n)$ colors are always sufficient and that $\Omega(\log n)$ colors are sometimes necessary. background 0.99 0.03 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 We improve their upper bound to $O(\log^2 n)$. result 0.78 0.96 0.32 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We prove that there are $O(n)$ tangencies among any set of $n$ red and blue planar curves in which every pair of curves intersects at most once and no two curves of the same color intersect. If every pair of curves may intersect more than once, then it is known that the number of tangencies could be super-linear. However, we show that a linear upper bound still holds if we replace tangencies by pairwise disjoint connecting curves that all intersect a certain face of the arrangement of red and blue curves. The latter result has an application for the following problem studied by Keller, Rok and Smorodinsky [Disc.\ Comput.\ Geom.\ (2020)] in the context of \emph{conflict-free coloring} of \emph{string graphs}: what is the minimum number of colors that is always sufficient to color the members of any family of $n$ \emph{grounded L-shapes} such that among the L-shapes intersected by any L-shape there is one with a unique color? They showed that $O(\log^3 n)$ colors are always sufficient and that $\Omega(\log n)$ colors are sometimes necessary. We improve their upper bound to $O(\log^2 n)$.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.